State | How are training education courses funded? | What % of compensation budget allocated for training development | How much priority does training get for budget? | Who are decision-makers for training funding levels? | What is the time limit for spending training funds? | What are your most difficult funding issues for training? | Most successful training funding strategies |
AR | A percentage of engineer-type training is funded through NHI or FHWA. For non-engineering employees, funding is through district or division. Training development may be funded in-house, or outsourced using grant money | | - | HR and upper management | - | - | - |
AZ | Through DOT divisions | 0.043 | Training has never been cut for budget | Top management, Office of Economic Development administrator | Annual | New technology | |
CA | Professional Development for Planning is funded from federal SPR funds. The Office of Professional Development identifies training needs and makes recommendations for budget planning. Money approved through becomes matching state funds for SPR-funded proj | 0.01 | - | Transportation Planning Division Chief | Multi-year | Retirement and politics | Exercise a statewide focus, with headquarters being the primary stewards of funds |
ID | Technical training has its own budget. All other training is from the trainee's cost center | 1.0-1.5% | Not high; outsourcing of training is being explored for budgetary reasons | Executive staff | Annual | Attempting to be involved in strategic planning, dialogue with decision makers | No systematic strategy |
LA | Surface Transportation Program federal-reimbursement | 100% of Technology Transfer Section's budget | Budget cuts are distributed evenly | Undersecretary, Office of Management and Finance | Annual | Lack of funding, staff downsizing | The LRTC Technology Transfer and Training Advisory Committee chaired by the Associate Director, Technology Transfer |
MD | General fund | ~2% | Training is considered essential | Administrator/ Deputy Administrator | Annual | Dispensing a flat budget fairly | Disperse funds to most effective areas |
MI | Funded by each operational area | 0.000043 | We have experienced staff cuts, but not cuts in courses | Departmental Manager and Legislature | Annual | Educating decision makers | Decentralized training budget |
MO | Course funding is included in the HR budget | - | - | Dept director | - | Unfunded mandates | Outsourced multi-year contracts |
MT | Reimbursed with federal aid, and managed by the HR training program. Other funds from operating dept budgets. Engineering, maintenance, equipment have dedicated training funds | ~1% | Training is considered essential | Executive management with support from training staff | Annual | Convincing managers to allow employees time for training | The federal-aid reimbursement program |
ND | Majority of funding is state. Receive $80K in SPR federal funds through the Planning and Program Division | ~0.47% -- Derived by dividing the HR training budget by budget for salary and benefits. There are other training dollars spent. | Training is considered essential | Business Support Management and sr. executives | Annual | Employees do not have time for training | Pooled funding with other states in Region VIII to provide training over the Training Learning Network. Have also pooled funds with local public entities through the Bismarck State College Partnership |
|